In Re the Accounting of Cornell
195 N.E. 229, 266 N.Y. 620, 1935 N.Y. LEXIS 1499
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs payable out of the fund, and question certified answered in the affirmative. _No opinion.
*622 Concur: Crane, Ch, J,, Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Lqughran and Finch, JJ, Crouch, J., dissents on the ground that the burden of proof rested upon the objecting creditor and that he has failed to sustain it either under the language of the policy or under the language of the application.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re the Accounting of Cornell, 195 N.E. 229, 266 N.Y. 620, 1935 N.Y. LEXIS 1499 (N.Y. 1935).
195 N.E. 229 (In Re the Accounting of Cornell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Estate of Conover
46 Misc. 2d 336 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1965)
In re the Estate of Cava
174 Misc. 750 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1940)
Morgan v. Sackett
172 Misc. 855 (New York Supreme Court, 1939)
In re the Estate of Valverde
169 Misc. 121 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1938)
Miller v. McCarthy
270 N.W. 559 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1936)
Deyo v. Grosfeld
163 Misc. 27 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1936)