Home/New York Court of Appeals/In Re the Accounting of Cornell

In Re the Accounting of Cornell

195 N.E. 229, 266 N.Y. 620, 1935 N.Y. LEXIS 1499
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 12, 1935
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 195 N.E. 229 (In Re the Accounting of Cornell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re the Accounting of Cornell, 195 N.E. 229, 266 N.Y. 620, 1935 N.Y. LEXIS 1499 (N.Y. 1935).

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs payable out of the fund, and question certified answered in the affirmative. _No opinion.

*622 Concur: Crane, Ch, J,, Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Lqughran and Finch, JJ, Crouch, J., dissents on the ground that the burden of proof rested upon the objecting creditor and that he has failed to sustain it either under the language of the policy or under the language of the application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Estate of Conover
46 Misc. 2d 336 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1965)
In re the Estate of Cava
174 Misc. 750 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1940)
Morgan v. Sackett
172 Misc. 855 (New York Supreme Court, 1939)
In re the Estate of Valverde
169 Misc. 121 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1938)
Miller v. McCarthy
270 N.W. 559 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1936)
Deyo v. Grosfeld
163 Misc. 27 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
195 N.E. 229, 266 N.Y. 620, 1935 N.Y. LEXIS 1499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-accounting-of-cornell-ny-1935.