In re the Accounting of Chase National Bank

New York Surrogate's Court

In re the Accounting of Chase National Bank

180 Misc. 987, 42 N.Y.S.2d 524, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2030

CourtNew York Surrogate's Court

DecidedJune 9, 1943

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 180 Misc. 987 (In re the Accounting of Chase National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Accounting of Chase National Bank, 180 Misc. 987, 42 N.Y.S.2d 524, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2030 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

Howell, S.

The testator left all his property in trust to pay the net income, except that. from his dwelling in Awosting, N. J., to his wife for life and thereafter to his daughter for life, remainder to his grandchild. As to his dwelling at Awosting, N. J., he directed the trustee to permit his wife to occupy the same “ at the nominal rental of one dollar per year ” during her lifetime or for such period or periods as she should choose, but, if she would rather receive the net income than occupy it, he conferred upon her the right to direct the trustee to rent it and pay her the net income thereof for her life or until the property should be sold.

The premises had been purchased by the decedent in 1920 and owned by him ever since, he paying the taxes and carrying charges thereon out of Ms own funds up to the time of his death. The executor and trustee prays for a construction of the will to determine whether the carrying charges of the New Jersey dwelling being occupied by the widow" under the terms of the will at the nominal rental of one dollar per year should be paid out of income or principal. The executor and trustee urges that they should be paid out of principal and the special guardian concurs. In support of that contention is cited the case of Matter of Guggenheimer (168 Misc. 1), in wMch the facts were strikingly similar to those in a case recently considered by this court (Matter of the Estate of Jaeck, dated June [988]*9888, 1943, unreported) in which this court reached the conclusion that carrying charges should be paid out of principal.

Beading the will now under consideration in connection with the circumstances concerning the property known to the testator when he made the will, I reach the conclusion that his intention was to benefit his wife by permitting her to occupy the-New Jersey dwelling at her election free of charge except for the nominal ‘ ‘ one dollar per year ’ ’, and that therefore the carrying charges of that property are properly payable out of principal.

Submit decree on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howell, S.

The testator left all his property in trust to pay the net income, except that. from his dwelling in Awosting, N. J., to his wife for life and thereafter to his daughter for life, remainder to his grandchild. As to his dwelling at Awosting, N. J., he directed the trustee to permit his wife to occupy the same “ at the nominal rental of one dollar per year ” during her lifetime or for such period or periods as she should choose, but, if she would rather receive the net income than occupy it, he conferred upon her the right to direct the trustee to rent it and pay her the net income thereof for her life or until the property should be sold.

The premises had been purchased by the decedent in 1920 and owned by him ever since, he paying the taxes and carrying charges thereon out of Ms own funds up to the time of his death. The executor and trustee prays for a construction of the will to determine whether the carrying charges of the New Jersey dwelling being occupied by the widow" under the terms of the will at the nominal rental of one dollar per year should be paid out of income or principal. The executor and trustee urges that they should be paid out of principal and the special guardian concurs. In support of that contention is cited the case of Matter of Guggenheimer (168 Misc. 1), in wMch the facts were strikingly similar to those in a case recently considered by this court (Matter of the Estate of Jaeck, dated June [988]*9888, 1943, unreported) in which this court reached the conclusion that carrying charges should be paid out of principal.

Beading the will now under consideration in connection with the circumstances concerning the property known to the testator when he made the will, I reach the conclusion that his intention was to benefit his wife by permitting her to occupy the-New Jersey dwelling at her election free of charge except for the nominal ‘ ‘ one dollar per year ’ ’, and that therefore the carrying charges of that property are properly payable out of principal.

Submit decree on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

180 Misc. 987, 42 N.Y.S.2d 524, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2030, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-accounting-of-chase-national-bank-nysurct-1943.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack