In re the Accounting of Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.
99 N.E.2d 10, 302 N.Y. 791, 1951 N.Y. LEXIS 929
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re the Accounting of Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 303 N.Y. 916 →
Opinion
Motion for reargument or, in the alternative, to amend the remittitur. Motion for reargument denied. Motion to amend the remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended to provide that the orders of the Appellate Division and the decrees of the Surrogate’s Court are reversed, with costs payable out of the fund, and that the Surrogate be directed to enter an order dismissing the petition. [See 299 N. Y. 697.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Accounting of Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 99 N.E.2d 10, 302 N.Y. 791, 1951 N.Y. LEXIS 929 (N.Y. 1951).
99 N.E.2d 10 (In re the Accounting of Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re the Accounting of Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.
87 N.E.2d 73 (New York Court of Appeals, 1949)