In re the Accounting of Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.

New York Court of Appeals

In re the Accounting of Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.

99 N.E.2d 10, 302 N.Y. 791, 1951 N.Y. LEXIS 929

New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 13, 1951·Published

Opinion

Motion for reargument or, in the alternative, to amend the remittitur. Motion for reargument denied. Motion to amend the remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended to provide that the orders of the Appellate Division and the decrees of the Surrogate’s Court are reversed, with costs payable out of the fund, and that the Surrogate be directed to enter an order dismissing the petition. [See 299 N. Y. 697.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for reargument or, in the alternative, to amend the remittitur. Motion for reargument denied. Motion to amend the remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended to provide that the orders of the Appellate Division and the decrees of the Surrogate’s Court are reversed, with costs payable out of the fund, and that the Surrogate be directed to enter an order dismissing the petition. [See 299 N. Y. 697.]

In re the Accounting of Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 99 N.E.2d 10, 302 N.Y. 791, 1951 N.Y. LEXIS 929 (N.Y. 1951).

Pincite

99 N.E.2d 10 (In re the Accounting of Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.