Home/New York Court of Appeals/In Re the Accounting of Ball

In Re the Accounting of Ball

110 N.E. 1038, 216 N.Y. 639, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 838
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 12, 1915·Published

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs to the respondent Thomas J. Caulfield and both special guardians who were represented upon the argument; no opinion.

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN, SEABURY and POUND, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re the Accounting of Ball, 110 N.E. 1038, 216 N.Y. 639, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 838 (N.Y. 1915).

110 N.E. 1038 (In Re the Accounting of Ball) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.