In Re the Accounting of Ball
110 N.E. 1038, 216 N.Y. 639, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 838
This text of 110 N.E. 1038 (In Re the Accounting of Ball) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In Re the Accounting of Ball, 110 N.E. 1038, 216 N.Y. 639, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 838 (N.Y. 1915).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs to the respondent Thomas J. Caulfield and both special guardians who were represented upon the argument; no opinion.
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN, SEABURY and POUND, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
110 N.E. 1038, 216 N.Y. 639, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-accounting-of-ball-ny-1915.