In Re the Accounting of Baker

112 N.E. 1053, 217 N.Y. 679, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1453
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 14, 1916·Published

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs payable out of the estate; no opinion.

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Cuddeback, Cardozo, Seabury and Pound, JJ. Dissenting: Chase and Collin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re the Accounting of Baker, 112 N.E. 1053, 217 N.Y. 679, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1453 (N.Y. 1916).

112 N.E. 1053 (In Re the Accounting of Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.