In Re the Accounting of Bach

166 N.E. 309, 250 N.Y. 521, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1011
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 31, 1928·Published

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J,, Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re the Accounting of Bach, 166 N.E. 309, 250 N.Y. 521, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1011 (N.Y. 1928).

166 N.E. 309 (In Re the Accounting of Bach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.