In re the Accounting of Altz

274 A.D. 894, 82 N.Y.S.2d 629, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3935
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 11, 1948
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 274 A.D. 894 (In re the Accounting of Altz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Accounting of Altz, 274 A.D. 894, 82 N.Y.S.2d 629, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3935 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

Opinion

Decree of the Surrogate’s Court, County of Westchester, judicially settling the final account of appellant, as executrix, and directing her to pay .the claim of respondent in the sum of $537.50, with interest, and to pay to respondent’s attorney certain costs and disbursements, as taxed, in the sum of $232, modified on the law by striking therefrom the second and third decretal paragraphs and substituting in place thereof the following paragraph: “ Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the claim of said Arnold Krimont in the sum of $537.50 for. real estate broker’s commissions, alleged to have been earned and due from the deceased, is invalid and that the objections of said claimant to the accounting by the said executrix be and the same are hereby dismissed, and it is further ”; by striking the word “ then ” from the fourth decretal paragraph, and by striking the following from the fifth decretal paragraph: upon making the payments aforesaid and taking and filing the receipts and releases therefor ”. As so modified, the decree, insofar as appealed from, is unanimously affirmed, with costs to appellant, to be paid by respondent personally. In our opinion mere agreement as to price on a proposed sale of real property does not constitute a meeting of the minds of vendor and vendee so as to entitle the real estate broker to commissions. The parties must be brought to agreement with respect to all terms customarily encountered in such a transaction. (Sibbald v. Bethlehem, Iron Co., 83 N. Y. 378, 382; Haase v. Schneider, 112 App. Div. 336.) Present — Johnston, Acting P. J., Adel, Nolan, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sanders A. Kahn Associates, Inc. v. Maidman
69 Misc. 2d 90 (New York Supreme Court, 1971)
Kaelin v. Warner
267 N.E.2d 86 (New York Court of Appeals, 1971)
Charles S. Glassman Associates, Inc. v. Hallen Realty Corp.
37 Misc. 2d 877 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Landow-Luzier Co. v. Grey
34 Misc. 2d 1061 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Points East Realty Corp. v. Laccio
35 Misc. 2d 157 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
274 A.D. 894, 82 N.Y.S.2d 629, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-accounting-of-altz-nyappdiv-1948.