In re the Accounting of Adomoski

New York Court of Appeals

In re the Accounting of Adomoski

161 N.E.2d 213, 6 N.Y.2d 927, 190 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1959 N.Y. LEXIS 1205

DecidedJuly 8, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 161 N.E.2d 213 (In re the Accounting of Adomoski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Accounting of Adomoski, 161 N.E.2d 213, 6 N.Y.2d 927, 190 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1959 N.Y. LEXIS 1205 (N.Y. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Order modified by reducing the amount of the Swachey claim from $1,875 to $45 (Personal Property Law, § 31, subd. 7) and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs to any party. No opinion.

Concur: Judges Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis and Burke. Chief Judge Conway and Judge Froessel dissent and vote to affirm upon the ground that the Statute of Frauds was not pleaded (see Civ. Prac. Act, § 242).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order modified by reducing the amount of the Swachey claim from $1,875 to $45 (Personal Property Law, § 31, subd. 7) and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs to any party. No opinion.

Concur: Judges Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis and Burke. Chief Judge Conway and Judge Froessel dissent and vote to affirm upon the ground that the Statute of Frauds was not pleaded (see Civ. Prac. Act, § 242).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

161 N.E.2d 213, 6 N.Y.2d 927, 190 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1959 N.Y. LEXIS 1205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-accounting-of-adomoski-ny-1959.