In Re the Accounting of Ackerman
22 N.E. 552, 116 N.Y. 654, 71 Sickels 654, 1889 N.Y. LEXIS 1383
Opinion
reads for affirmance.
All concur, except Bradley and Haight, JJ., not sitting, and Vann, J., not voting.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re the Accounting of Ackerman, 22 N.E. 552, 116 N.Y. 654, 71 Sickels 654, 1889 N.Y. LEXIS 1383 (N.Y. 1889).
22 N.E. 552 (In Re the Accounting of Ackerman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Santora v. Santora
199 Misc. 335 (New York Family Court, 1950)
Montayre v. Montayre
175 Misc. 202 (New York Supreme Court, 1940)
Wood v. Wood
61 A.D. 96 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901)