In re the Abitration between Fitzgerald & Sperry Gyroscope Co.

283 A.D. 1036, 131 N.Y.S.2d 873, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6207

This text of 283 A.D. 1036 (In re the Abitration between Fitzgerald & Sperry Gyroscope Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Abitration between Fitzgerald & Sperry Gyroscope Co., 283 A.D. 1036, 131 N.Y.S.2d 873, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6207 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

Opinion

There are issues of fact which must be determined by the chosen medium of arbitration. It is noted that the denial of clearance was tentative and not final. It may be that questions of law and public policy will survive the arbitration, and as to which the arbitrator’s award may not be conclusive. Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the petitioner-respondent. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Bastow and Botein, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
283 A.D. 1036, 131 N.Y.S.2d 873, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-abitration-between-fitzgerald-sperry-gyroscope-co-nyappdiv-1954.