In re Thames

61 F. App'x 898
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 2, 2003
DocketNo. 03-6046
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 61 F. App'x 898 (In re Thames) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Thames, 61 F. App'x 898 (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Lee Thames petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. As the district court recently took significant action in the case by issuing an order to show cause on March 17, 2003, and Thames filed his response to the motion on April 9, 2003, we deny Thames’ petition as moot. We deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson v. Brooks, Warden
541 U.S. 1000 (Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 F. App'x 898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-thames-ca4-2003.