in Re: Texas Objectors

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 21, 2005
Docket13-05-00028-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Texas Objectors (in Re: Texas Objectors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Texas Objectors, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-05-028-CV


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG


IN RE: TEXAS OBJECTORS


On Petition for Writ of Mandamus and

Motion for Emergency Temporary Relief                                                                                                                      


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

          On January 21, 2005, relators, the “Texas Objectors”, Eddie Bell, Wanda Bell, Ronnie Brooks, Dennis Burton, Freda Burton, Steven Busby, Sherri Chambers, George Brent Chivers, Charles Dadney, Mary Edison, Royce Groves, Jimmy Headrick, Sr., Henry Johnson, Lawrence C. Marin, Betty Nelms, Paul Nichols, Melvina M. Otero Yvonne Shelton, Pam S. Smith, Jacqueline Sowells, Frankie Thomas, Consetta Wells, Rebecca Williams, Jere L. Beasley, W. Daniel Miles, J. Mark Englehart, and Clinton C. Carter, filed a petition for writ of mandamus with this Court in which they allege that on January 19, 2005, the 357th Judicial District Court abused its discretion by ordering relators to appear in Cameron County for depositions beginning at 8:30 a.m. on Monday, January 24, 2005 and continuing through January 26, 2005. Relators’ petition for writ of mandamus asks this Court to vacate the district court’s order of January 19, 2005. In addition, relators have filed a motion for emergency temporary relief, asking this Court to stay the order of January 19, 2005 to provide an opportunity for this Court to review the merits of its petition for writ of mandamus. The real parties in interest have filed a response to the petition for writ of mandamus, as well as a motion opposing relators’ motion for emergency temporary relief.           Having reviewed the petition, response, and motions, this Court denies all relief requested by relators.

PER CURIAM



Memorandum Opinion delivered

and filed this the 21st day of January, 2005.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Texas Objectors, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-texas-objectors-texapp-2005.