In Re Texas Farm Bureau Underwriters v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Texas Farm Bureau Underwriters v. the State of Texas (In Re Texas Farm Bureau Underwriters v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-26-00273-CV
IN RE TEXAS FARM BUREAU UNDERWRITERS
Original Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice Velia J. Meza, Justice
Delivered and Filed: June 3, 2026
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On April 6, 2026, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Mandamus is an
extraordinary remedy, available only when the relator can show (1) the trial court clearly abused
its discretion or violated a duty imposed by law; and (2) there is no adequate remedy by way of
appeal. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). After
considering the petition and the record, this court concludes relator has not shown that it is entitled
to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 52.8(a).
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 24-17793, styled Vinson v. Texas Farm Bureau Insurance Company, pending in the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas, the Honorable Albert D. Pattillo, III presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Texas Farm Bureau Underwriters v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-texas-farm-bureau-underwriters-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp4-2026.