in Re: Texas Department of Public Safety

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 18, 2009
Docket13-09-00312-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Texas Department of Public Safety (in Re: Texas Department of Public Safety) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Texas Department of Public Safety, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-09-00312-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE: TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Benavides Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion1

Relator, Texas Department of Public Safety, filed a petition for writ of mandamus

in the above cause on June 9, 2009, through which it sought to compel the trial court to

rule on its plea to the jurisdiction and alternatively, motion for summary judgment. Relator

further sought emergency relief in the form of a stay. On June 10, the Court granted in

part, and denied in part, the motion for emergency relief, and requested that the real party

in interest file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus.

On June 15, relator supplemented the mandamus record with the trial court’s rulings

1 See T EX . R . A PP . P . 5 2 .8 (d ) (“W hen denying relief, the court m ay hand dow n an opinio n but is not required to do so.”); T EX . R . A PP . P . 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and m em orandum opinions). on its plea to the jurisdiction and alternatively, motion for summary judgment, and related

rulings. Because respondent has ruled on relator's plea to the jurisdiction and alternatively,

motion for summary judgment, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus asking us to require

respondent to rule is moot. See In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 166 S.W.3d 732, 737

(Tex. 2005) (“A case becomes moot if a controversy ceases to exist between the parties

at any stage of the legal proceedings . . .”); State Bar of Texas v. Gomez, 891 S.W.2d 243,

245 (Tex. 1994) (stating that, for a controversy to be justiciable, there must be a real

controversy between the parties that will be actually resolved by the judicial relief sought).

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus

and the supplemental record thereto, is of the opinion that this matter has been rendered

moot. Accordingly, the Court LIFTS the stay previously imposed by this Court and

DISMISSES the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See TEX . R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this 18th day of June, 2009.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.
166 S.W.3d 732 (Texas Supreme Court, 2005)
The State Bar of Texas v. Gomez
891 S.W.2d 243 (Texas Supreme Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Texas Department of Public Safety, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-texas-department-of-public-safety-texapp-2009.