In re Texas City Refinery Ultracracker Emission Litigation

391 S.W.3d 680, 2010 WL 9038442, 2010 Tex. LEXIS 838
CourtTexas Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
DecidedOctober 28, 2010
DocketNo. 10-0689
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 391 S.W.3d 680 (In re Texas City Refinery Ultracracker Emission Litigation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Texas City Refinery Ultracracker Emission Litigation, 391 S.W.3d 680, 2010 WL 9038442, 2010 Tex. LEXIS 838 (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

ON REVIEW BY THE MULTIDIS-TRICT LITIGATION PANEL

PER CURIAM.

BP Products North America, Inc. seeks assignment of a pretrial judge to eleven lawsuits involving an incident at its refinery in Texas City. In each case, BP Products is a defendant and there are multiple plaintiffs. All eleven cases are pending in Galveston County. More filings are expected. While the plaintiffs have not agreed to the motion, they have not seriously opposed it.

The Local Administrative Judge for Galveston County has assigned a single district judge to handle the pretrial phase of all the cases. A pretrial judge appoint[681]*681ed under the MDL procedures, however, is given extensive authority over all pretrial aspects of the case, and in most instances its pretrial rulings will be binding when the case is remanded for trial. See Tex.R. Jud. Admin. 13.6, 13.8. We have concluded that assigning these cases to an MDL pretrial judge will further the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of the litigation.

The motion is granted.

Presiding Judge PEEPLES, Chief Justices STONE and WRIGHT, and Justices McCLURE and BROWN, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Spicewood Wildfire Litigation
434 S.W.3d 873 (Texas Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
391 S.W.3d 680, 2010 WL 9038442, 2010 Tex. LEXIS 838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-texas-city-refinery-ultracracker-emission-litigation-texjpml-2010.