in Re: Tetra Applied Technologies
This text of in Re: Tetra Applied Technologies (in Re: Tetra Applied Technologies) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-05-276-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
___________________________________________________________________
IN RE TETRA APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES, L.P.
_________________________________________________________________
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus ___________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Yañez
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
Relator, TETRA Applied Technologies, L.P., filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency stay in the above cause on April 19, 2005. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus and the motion for emergency stay, is of the opinion that relator has not shown itself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the motion for emergency stay and the petition for writ of mandamus are DENIED. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this 20th day of April, 2005.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Tetra Applied Technologies, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tetra-applied-technologies-texapp-2005.