In re Teshawnia F.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Teshawnia F.

16 A.D.3d 280, 791 N.Y.S.2d 411, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3121

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 24, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 16 A.D.3d 280 (In re Teshawnia F.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Teshawnia F., 16 A.D.3d 280, 791 N.Y.S.2d 411, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3121 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

— Orders of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Jody Adams, J.), entered on or about January 8, 2004, which, upon a fact-finding determination that respondent neglected two of the subject children, released the subject children to respondent’s custody under the supervision of the Administration for Children’s Services for a period of six months, unanimously reversed, on the facts, without costs, the fact-finding determination vacated and the petition dismissed.

As petitioner concedes, the record developed at the fact-finding hearing does not support a finding of neglect based on excessive corporal punishment (Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i] [B]; see Matter of Peter G., 6 AD3d 201 [2004]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Ellerin and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Orders of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Jody Adams, J.), entered on or about January 8, 2004, which, upon a fact-finding determination that respondent neglected two of the subject children, released the subject children to respondent’s custody under the supervision of the Administration for Children’s Services for a period of six months, unanimously reversed, on the facts, without costs, the fact-finding determination vacated and the petition dismissed.

As petitioner concedes, the record developed at the fact-finding hearing does not support a finding of neglect based on excessive corporal punishment (Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i] [B]; see Matter of Peter G., 6 AD3d 201 [2004]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Ellerin and Nardelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.3d 280, 791 N.Y.S.2d 411, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-teshawnia-f-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack