in Re Terry Lee Nelson

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 28, 2015
Docket10-15-00174-CR
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Terry Lee Nelson (in Re Terry Lee Nelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Terry Lee Nelson, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-15-00174-CR

IN RE TERRY LEE NELSON

Original Proceeding

From the 13th District Court Navarro County, Texas Trial Court No. 32,660-CR

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Terry Lee Nelson has filed a petition for writ of mandamus1 that seeks post-

conviction habeas relief. Nelson requests us to order the convicting trial court to reverse

his felony conviction for sexual assault on the ground of actual innocence.

An intermediate court of appeals has no jurisdiction over post-conviction writs of

1 The petition has several procedural deficiencies. It lacks proof of service; a copy of all documents presented to this Court must be served on all parties (i.e., the district attorney, as real party in interest, and the trial court, as respondent) and must contain proof of service. TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5, 52.2. It lacks an appendix and a record. Id. 52.3(k), 52.7. And it does not include the certification required by Rule 52.3(j). Id. 52.3(j). To expedite this matter, we implement Rule of Appellate Procedure 2 to suspend these requirements. Id. 2. habeas corpus in felony cases. See Ex parte Martinez, 175 S.W.3d 510, 512-13 (Tex. App.—

Texarkana 2005, orig. proceeding) (citing TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07(3)(a), (b)

(West 2005)); Self v. State, 122 S.W.3d 294, 294-95 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2003, no pet.)

(same). The Court of Criminal Appeals and this court have recognized that “the exclusive

post-conviction remedy in final felony convictions in Texas courts is through a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to [article] 11.07.” Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 525 n.8 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1996); see Ex parte Mendenhall, 209 S.W.3d 260, 261 (Tex. App.—Waco 2006, no

pet.). Furthermore, intermediate courts of appeals do not have original habeas corpus

jurisdiction in criminal-law matters. Ex parte Hearon, 3 S.W.3d 650 (Tex. App.—Waco

1999, orig. proceeding).

Because we have no jurisdiction over a post-conviction habeas corpus proceeding

in a felony case, we dismiss Nelson’s petition for lack of jurisdiction.

REX D. DAVIS Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Dismissed Opinion delivered and filed May 28, 2015 Do not publish [OT06]

In re Nelson Page 2 In re Nelson Page 3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Martinez
175 S.W.3d 510 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Ex Parte Mendenhall
209 S.W.3d 260 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Ex Parte Hearon
3 S.W.3d 650 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)
Self v. State
122 S.W.3d 294 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Terry Lee Nelson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-terry-lee-nelson-texapp-2015.