in Re Terry Blankenship, Relator

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 3, 2013·No. 07-13-00202-CV·Published

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-13-00202-CV

IN RE TERRY BLANKENSHIP, RELATOR

September 3, 2013

ON ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

Pending before the court is the “application for writ of mandamus to compel

defendants to answer prior motions for discovery and written discovery pursuant to

Texas Rules of Civil Procedure” filed by Terry Blankenship, relator. We deny the

application.

First, Texas Government Code § 22.221 expressly limits the mandamus

jurisdiction of the courts of appeals to writs necessary to enforce the jurisdiction of the

court of appeals and writs against specified district or county court judges in the court of

appeals’ district. TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(a), (b) (West 2004). Consequently,

unless necessary to enforce our jurisdiction, we have no jurisdiction to issue a writ of

mandamus against individual parties. See Id. § 22.221(b). Furthermore, relator has not shown how pursuing discovery in a trial court proceeding that has been dismissed

affects this court’s jurisdiction.

Next, relator has not filed a record or an appendix with his petition. In an original

mandamus proceeding, the petition must be accompanied by a certified or sworn copy

of every document that is material to a relator’s claim for relief and that was filed in any

underlying proceeding. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7(a)(1). Furthermore, a relator’s burden

on mandamus includes meeting the requirement that “[e]very statement of fact in the

petition [is] supported by citation to competent evidence included in the appendix or

record.” TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(g). In short, a relator must supply a record sufficient to

establish the right to mandamus relief. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex.

1992). Relator has not done so and we are therefore unable to determine whether he is

entitled to mandamus relief.

Accordingly, we deny the application for a writ of mandamus.

Per Curiam

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Terry Blankenship, Relator, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

in Re Terry Blankenship, Relator (in Re Terry Blankenship, Relator) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walker v. Packer
827 S.W.2d 833 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)