in Re Terr'l La'yonne Mark
Opinion
Opinion issued December 15, 2016
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
abated this original proceeding and lifted this Court’s prior stay to allow the new respondent, the Honorable David S. Perwin, to rule on relator’s pending motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 7.2(b).
On December 2, 2016, relator filed a “Notice of Nonsuit” in this Court, which we construe as a motion to dismiss. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Relator explains that the parties have settled the transfer issue in the trial court, the sole subject of this petition, which renders this case moot. Although there is no certificate of conference with relator’s motion, it contains a certificate of service on counsel for the real parties in interest and has been on file with this Court for more than ten days with no response. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a)(2).
Accordingly, we withdraw the abatement order, issued on November 8, 2016, reinstate this case, construe relator’s notice of nonsuit as a motion to dismiss, grant the motion, and dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Lloyd.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Terr'l La'yonne Mark (in Re Terr'l La'yonne Mark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.