In re Terrell R.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Terrell R.

257 A.D.2d 544, 682 N.Y.S.2d 595, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 699

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 28, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 257 A.D.2d 544 (In re Terrell R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Terrell R., 257 A.D.2d 544, 682 N.Y.S.2d 595, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 699 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposi[545]*545tion, Family Court, New York County (Rhoda Cohen, J.), entered on or about April 23, 1998, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon his admission that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, and placed him with the Office for Children’s Services for 14 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Appellant’s suppression motion was properly denied. We see no reason to disturb the hearing court’s credibility determinations, which are supported by the record (see, People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759, 761). Concur—Williams, J. P., Lerner, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposi[545]*545tion, Family Court, New York County (Rhoda Cohen, J.), entered on or about April 23, 1998, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon his admission that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, and placed him with the Office for Children’s Services for 14 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Appellant’s suppression motion was properly denied. We see no reason to disturb the hearing court’s credibility determinations, which are supported by the record (see, People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759, 761). Concur—Williams, J. P., Lerner, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 A.D.2d 544, 682 N.Y.S.2d 595, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-terrell-r-nyappdiv-1999.