in Re Teresita Cutler
This text of in Re Teresita Cutler (in Re Teresita Cutler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas September 3, 2014
No. 04-14-00617-CV
IN RE Teresita CUTLER
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
ORDER
Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
On September 2, 2014, relator Teresita Cutler filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency stay pending a ruling on the mandamus petition. The court has considered the petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency stay are DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.
It is so ORDERED on September 3rd, 2014.
_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 3rd day of September, 2014.
_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2013-CI-00007, styled In the Matter of the Marriage of Teresita Cutler and Ernest Eugene Cutler Jr., pending in the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Richard Price presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Teresita Cutler, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-teresita-cutler-texapp-2014.