in Re: Teresa Corral-Lerma
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
§ IN RE § No. 08-11-00146-CV
TERESA CORRAL-LERMA, § AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
§ RELATOR. §
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator filed a petition for writ of prohibition and writ of mandamus, contending that the
trial court lacks jurisdiction to conduct a trial on the issue of attorney’s fees because its plenary
power has expired and an appeal is pending in this Court. See In re Miranda, 142 S.W.3d 354,
356 (Tex.App.--El Paso 2004, orig. proceeding)(holding that writ of mandamus will issue if trial
court enters void order after its plenary power expires); In re Nguyen, 155 S.W.3d 191, 194 (Tex.
App.--Tyler 2003, orig. proceeding)(holding that writ of prohibition will issue to enforce
jurisdiction of appellate court). Relator has the burden of showing that she is entitled to an
extraordinary writ. See In re Am. Nat’l Ins. Co., 242 S.W.3d 831, 834 (Tex.App.--El Paso 2007,
orig. proceeding); TEX .R.APP .P. 52.7(a)(1). Relator has not met this burden. Accordingly, the
petition is denied.
May 25, 2011 DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Chief Justice
Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re: Teresa Corral-Lerma (in Re: Teresa Corral-Lerma) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.