In re: Teodoro-Basilio
This text of In re: Teodoro-Basilio (In re: Teodoro-Basilio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2332
In re: ELEAZAR TEODORO-BASILIO, a/k/a Chelelo, a/k/a J. Eleazar Teodoro-Basilio, a/k/a Huichol,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:02-cr-00094-GCM-1)
Submitted: May 13, 2011 Decided: May 31, 2011
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eleazar Teodoro-Basilio, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Eleazar Teodoro-Basilio petitions for a writ of
mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting
on his Petition for Writ of Error Audita Querela. He seeks an
order from this court directing the district court to act.
Although we find that mandamus relief is not warranted because
the delay is not unreasonable, we deny the mandamus petition
without prejudice to the filing of another mandamus petition if
the district court does not act expeditiously. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In re: Teodoro-Basilio, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-teodoro-basilio-ca4-2011.