In re: Teodoro-Basilio

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 31, 2011
Docket10-2332
StatusUnpublished

This text of In re: Teodoro-Basilio (In re: Teodoro-Basilio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re: Teodoro-Basilio, (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2332

In re: ELEAZAR TEODORO-BASILIO, a/k/a Chelelo, a/k/a J. Eleazar Teodoro-Basilio, a/k/a Huichol,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:02-cr-00094-GCM-1)

Submitted: May 13, 2011 Decided: May 31, 2011

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eleazar Teodoro-Basilio, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Eleazar Teodoro-Basilio petitions for a writ of

mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting

on his Petition for Writ of Error Audita Querela. He seeks an

order from this court directing the district court to act.

Although we find that mandamus relief is not warranted because

the delay is not unreasonable, we deny the mandamus petition

without prejudice to the filing of another mandamus petition if

the district court does not act expeditiously. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In re: Teodoro-Basilio, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-teodoro-basilio-ca4-2011.