In re Tennessee Chemical Co.

122 B.R. 984, 1990 Bankr. LEXIS 2868, 1990 WL 257531
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee
DecidedSeptember 20, 1990
DocketBankruptcy No. 1-89-01106
StatusPublished

This text of 122 B.R. 984 (In re Tennessee Chemical Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Tennessee Chemical Co., 122 B.R. 984, 1990 Bankr. LEXIS 2868, 1990 WL 257531 (Tenn. 1990).

Opinion

ORDER AUTHORIZING SALE OF ASSETS, FREE AND CLEAR OF LIENS, DISBURSING PROCEEDS FROM SALE AT TIME OF CLOSING, AND GRANTING AND RECOGNIZING LIENS

RALPH H. KELLEY, Chief Judge.

This cause came on for hearing pursuant to notice on September 19, 1990, upon the Motion of the Trustee (“Motion”) on behalf of Tennessee Chemical Company (“Debt- or”) for the sale (“Sale”) of assets to Boli-den Intertrade A.G. (“Boliden”), filed August 29, 1990 which assets include all assets set forth in paragraph 20 of the Motion (“Assets”). At the hearing, the Court heard testimony of witnesses and arguments of counsel and reviewed the record of proceedings in this cause. There were no other qualifying bids for the Assets. The only parties objecting to the said motion and relief sought therein were Polk County, Tennessee, UTLX, and Peridot Chemical. All of these parties withdrew their objections orally at the hearing.

The Court finds that compelling business reasons require that the Assets be sold and sold at this time; that, without approval of the Sale today, the Trustee would be required to liquidate the Assets; that the Debtor, Creditors’ Committee and Trustee actively and aggressively marketed the Assets and made every reasonable effort to identify and interest possible purchasers; that the Creditors’ Committee was involved in the decision to sell the Assets, participated in the preliminary screening of and negotiations with potential purchasers, and participated in the final decision to sell the Assets to Boliden; that the Sale is an arms’ length transaction with a third party and was negotiated in good faith; that the price [985]*985is fair and reasonable; that the Sale is in the best interests of the estate and will maximize the distribution to all creditors and parties in interest, including the parties that objected and then withdrew their objections; that the Motion adequately describes the terms of the Sale and is consistent with the terms set out in the Term Sheet considered by this Court in Hearings on February 23, 1990, and March 16, 1990, and approved in principle by this Court by Orders of March 19, 1990, and March 21, 1990, from which no appeal was taken; that the Motion adequately describes the changes from the Term Sheet and the reasons for such changes; that as a result of the Sale, all undisputed liens on the Assets will be fully satisfied; that the Motion fails to reflect a dispute over payments to CSXT that necessitates that a part of the payment to CSXT called for by the Motion to be held in escrow pending resolution of that dispute; that CSXT has consented to this change from the Motion and that the rights of the other creditors under the Motion are not affected by this change; that Shell Canada Limited (“Shell”) holds a valid lien on certain of the Assets; that the extent of Shell’s interest in the Assets is presently the subject of a bona fide dispute between the Trustee and Shell; that Shell’s interest in the Assets is adequately protected by the Trustee’s escrowing of $809,000 of the proceeds from the Sale and its lien on all of the non-real estate assets of the Debtor not being purchased by Boliden; that the price at which the Assets are being sold is greater than the aggregate value of all liens on the Assets; that as a result of the Sale, there is a cure or adequate assurance of prompt cure on all executory contracts and leases assumed by the Trustee and assigned to Boliden by the Sale; that Boliden’s guarantee of future performance of the contracts and leases assigned by the Sale provides adequate assurance of future performance; and that Boliden’s payment obligations under the Motion reflect and replace Boliden’s obligations to pay the Debtor the operating losses under the Management Agreement and Court Order of March 19, 1990.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 363(b) and Section 363(f) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Motion is approved and the Trustee is authorized to sell the Assets to Boliden upon the terms of the Motion and subject to the conditions set forth therein and subject to the terms of this Order; and it is further

ORDERED, that, pursuant to Section 363(f) of the Bankruptcy Code, the sale of Assets to Boliden shall be and hereby is deemed to be free and clear of all liens, claims and interests in or against the Assets;

ORDERED, that the Motion is being granted subject to the State of Tennessee and the United States of America and Boli-den successfully concluding negotiations and executing agreements by Thursday, September 20, 1990, not later than midnight

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
122 B.R. 984, 1990 Bankr. LEXIS 2868, 1990 WL 257531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tennessee-chemical-co-tneb-1990.