In re Tenner

314 U.S. 585, 62 S. Ct. 409, 86 L. Ed. 473, 1941 U.S. LEXIS 2
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 22, 1941·Published·Cited by 15 cases

Opinion

It is now here ordered by this Court that the State of California, its officers, agents, and servants and all other persons, are hereby prohibited from removing Joe Tenner or permitting him to be removed from the State of California pending the filing by him of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the Supreme Court of California and pending the disposition of that petition. The [586]*586petitioner is directed to file his petition for a writ of habeas corpus on or before January 7,1942. This order prohibiting the removal of Joe Tenner from the State of California is to remain in effect until the further order of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Tenner, 314 U.S. 585, 62 S. Ct. 409, 86 L. Ed. 473, 1941 U.S. LEXIS 2 (1941).

314 U.S. 585 (In re Tenner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

WEST VIRGINIA EX REL. McGRAW v. Comcast Corp.
705 F. Supp. 2d 441 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2010)
County of Mercer v. Amundsen
879 A.2d 366 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2005)
Council of City of Philadelphia v. Street
856 A.2d 893 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2004)
Commonwealth v. Schellenberger
568 A.2d 968 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1990)
State of Louisiana v. Aronson
252 A.2d 733 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1969)
Commonwealth v. 2101 Cooperative, Inc.
27 Pa. D. & C.2d 405 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1961)
Pennsylvania Bar Ass'n Endowment v. Robins
10 Pa. D. & C.2d 637 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1955)
Ex Parte Peairs
283 S.W.2d 755 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1955)
Curran v. Wooley
101 A.2d 303 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1953)
Buxton v. Midwestern Ins. Co.
102 F. Supp. 500 (W.D. Louisiana, 1952)
Johnson v. Wilson
131 F.2d 1 (Fifth Circuit, 1942)