In re Tenenbaum

889 A.2d 1165, 585 Pa. 651, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 3270
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 22, 2005
DocketNo. 1065 DISC 3
StatusPublished

This text of 889 A.2d 1165 (In re Tenenbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Tenenbaum, 889 A.2d 1165, 585 Pa. 651, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 3270 (Pa. 2005).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 22nd day of December, 2005, Joel D. Tenenbaum having been suspended from the practice of law in the State of Delaware for a period of three years by Opinion and Order of the Supreme Court of the State of Delaware decided August 5, 2005; the said Joel D. Tenenbaum having been directed on October 7, 2005, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is

ORDERED that Joel D. Tenenbaum is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of three years, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
889 A.2d 1165, 585 Pa. 651, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 3270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tenenbaum-pa-2005.