In Re Temitope A. Olageshin v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Temitope A. Olageshin v. the State of Texas (In Re Temitope A. Olageshin v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-23-00249-CV
In re Temitope A. Olageshin
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BELL COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the district
court’s order or orders regarding his child support obligations. A relator seeking mandamus
relief has the burden of providing the Court with a sufficient record to establish the right to relief.
Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992). By rule, the relator must file with the
petition “a certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to the relator’s claim for
relief and that was filed in any underlying proceeding.” Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a)(1). Here, Mr.
Olageshin has provided no sworn record or exhibits in support of his submission. Accordingly,
the petition is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8.
__________________________________________ Gisela Triana, Justice
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Theofanis
Filed: May 17, 2023
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Temitope A. Olageshin v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-temitope-a-olageshin-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.