In Re Temitope A. Olageshin v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 17, 2023
Docket03-23-00249-CV
StatusPublished

This text of In Re Temitope A. Olageshin v. the State of Texas (In Re Temitope A. Olageshin v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Temitope A. Olageshin v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-23-00249-CV

In re Temitope A. Olageshin

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BELL COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the district

court’s order or orders regarding his child support obligations. A relator seeking mandamus

relief has the burden of providing the Court with a sufficient record to establish the right to relief.

Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992). By rule, the relator must file with the

petition “a certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to the relator’s claim for

relief and that was filed in any underlying proceeding.” Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a)(1). Here, Mr.

Olageshin has provided no sworn record or exhibits in support of his submission. Accordingly,

the petition is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8.

__________________________________________ Gisela Triana, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Theofanis

Filed: May 17, 2023

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walker v. Packer
827 S.W.2d 833 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re Temitope A. Olageshin v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-temitope-a-olageshin-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.