In re Teitelbaum

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Teitelbaum

692 A.2d 43, 149 N.J. 26, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 133

DecidedApril 25, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 692 A.2d 43 (In re Teitelbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Teitelbaum, 692 A.2d 43, 149 N.J. 26, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 133 (N.J. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on December 10, 1996, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that HOWARD S. TEITELBAUM of EAST BRUNSWICK,’ who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1975, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for his violation of [27]*27RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that HOWARD S. TEITELBAUM is hereby suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months, effective May 16, 1997, and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he comply with Rule 1:20-20; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI