In Re: Techshell, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedSeptember 17, 2014
Docket14-1179
StatusUnpublished

This text of In Re: Techshell, Inc. (In Re: Techshell, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: Techshell, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2014).

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

IN RE TECHSHELL, INC. ______________________

2014-1179 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Reexamination No. 95/001,767. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

ROBERT B. DULANEY, III, Smith Risley Tempel Santos, of Atlanta, Georgia, argued for appellant. On the brief was SCOTT A. HORSTEMEYER, Thomas|Horstemeyer LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia. Of counsel were NORMAN A. CRAIN and DAN R. GRESHAM.

MEREDITH H. SCHOENFELD, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for intervenor. With her on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Solicitor, and MONICA B. LATEEF, Associate Solicitor. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, TARANTO and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 17, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re: Techshell, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-techshell-inc-cafc-2014.