In Re Technical Marine Maintenance Co., Inc. Appeal of Township of North Bergen, Hudson County

Third Circuit

In Re Technical Marine Maintenance Co., Inc. Appeal of Township of North Bergen, Hudson County

191 F.2d 851, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2893

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMarch 24, 1947

Docket9206

StatusPublished

This text of 191 F.2d 851 (In Re Technical Marine Maintenance Co., Inc. Appeal of Township of North Bergen, Hudson County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Technical Marine Maintenance Co., Inc. Appeal of Township of North Bergen, Hudson County, 191 F.2d 851, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2893 (3d Cir. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A painstaking examination of the appendices and the transcript of the record on appeal in the instant case demonstrates their inadequacy. For example, there is not included either in the appendices or in the record itself a copy of the lease executed by Township of North Bergen in the County of Hudson, the appellant, to Technical Marine Maintenance Co., Inc., the debtor; nor is there included therein any document or testimony which would demonstrate the nature of the connection, if any, between the debtor and Allied Ship Terminals, Inc. From colloquy we may gather that there are tax claims, wage claims and general claims filed in the case at bar but there is nothing in the record which would inform us with certainty either as to their amounts or their disposition. We may gather also that while the debtor has claims against the United States, the United States also has claims sounding in tort against the debtor. In short, what we have before us is but a small part of a large picture. Whether or not the court below was entitled to void the Chapter X proceedings ab initio and to make those portions of the order of July 22, 1946 presently complained of cannot be determined on this truncated record.

This complex matter is further complicated by the fact that there is pending in this court an appeal, In re Technical Marine Maintenance Co., 3 Cir., 169 F.2d 548, at our No. 9170, taken by the trustees of the debtor from the order of the court below of April 24, 1945. That order directed the trustees to turn over to the appellant Township the water-front property which constitutes a prime asset of the debtor. That order may have been abrogated by the provisions of the order of July 22, 1946 complained of. The question of the power of the court below to make the order of July 22, 1946 in view of the appeal pending at our No. 9170 must be determined. We cannot adjudicate this *852 question lacking; an-adequate record in the appeal at No. 9170. A- joint record will serve both appeals. The parties in the appeal at our No. 9170 and in the appeal at bar are the same.

We will order rehearing of the appeal at bar. We will also direct that the two appeals be consolidated for hearing, and the district court will be directed to certify to this court all of the original pleadings, papers, documents, claims and orders filed in the proceeding. The trustees and the debtor will be directed to print in a joint appendix for' the 'consolidated appeals all pertinent pleadings, papers, documents and orders, not heretofore printed in Ihe' appendices filed by the parties in the instant appeal, claims excepted. To the end that the trustees may proceed as indicated, the fifth paragraph of the order of July 22, 1946 of the district court will be vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

A painstaking examination of the appendices and the transcript of the record on appeal in the instant case demonstrates their inadequacy. For example, there is not included either in the appendices or in the record itself a copy of the lease executed by Township of North Bergen in the County of Hudson, the appellant, to Technical Marine Maintenance Co., Inc., the debtor; nor is there included therein any document or testimony which would demonstrate the nature of the connection, if any, between the debtor and Allied Ship Terminals, Inc. From colloquy we may gather that there are tax claims, wage claims and general claims filed in the case at bar but there is nothing in the record which would inform us with certainty either as to their amounts or their disposition. We may gather also that while the debtor has claims against the United States, the United States also has claims sounding in tort against the debtor. In short, what we have before us is but a small part of a large picture. Whether or not the court below was entitled to void the Chapter X proceedings ab initio and to make those portions of the order of July 22, 1946 presently complained of cannot be determined on this truncated record.

This complex matter is further complicated by the fact that there is pending in this court an appeal, In re Technical Marine Maintenance Co., 3 Cir., 169 F.2d 548, at our No. 9170, taken by the trustees of the debtor from the order of the court below of April 24, 1945. That order directed the trustees to turn over to the appellant Township the water-front property which constitutes a prime asset of the debtor. That order may have been abrogated by the provisions of the order of July 22, 1946 complained of. The question of the power of the court below to make the order of July 22, 1946 in view of the appeal pending at our No. 9170 must be determined. We cannot adjudicate this *852 question lacking; an-adequate record in the appeal at No. 9170. A- joint record will serve both appeals. The parties in the appeal at our No. 9170 and in the appeal at bar are the same.

We will order rehearing of the appeal at bar. We will also direct that the two appeals be consolidated for hearing, and the district court will be directed to certify to this court all of the original pleadings, papers, documents, claims and orders filed in the proceeding. The trustees and the debtor will be directed to print in a joint appendix for' the 'consolidated appeals all pertinent pleadings, papers, documents and orders, not heretofore printed in Ihe' appendices filed by the parties in the instant appeal, claims excepted. To the end that the trustees may proceed as indicated, the fifth paragraph of the order of July 22, 1946 of the district court will be vacated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 F.2d 851, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-technical-marine-maintenance-co-inc-appeal-of-township-of-north-ca3-1947.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack