In re T.D.

949 N.E.2d 43, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1556
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 22, 2011
Docket2011-0515
StatusPublished

This text of 949 N.E.2d 43 (In re T.D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re T.D., 949 N.E.2d 43, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1556 (Ohio 2011).

Opinion

Clinton App. No. CA2010-01-002, 2011-Ohio-671. Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decisions in 2008-1624, In re Smith, Allen App. No. 1-07-58, 2008-Ohio-3234, and 2009-0088, State v. Williams, Warren App. No. CA2008-02-029, 2008-Ohio-6195; and briefing schedule stayed.

Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., would accept Proposition of Law No. II without holding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Williams, Ca2008-02-029 (12-1-2008)
2008 Ohio 6195 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)
In Re Smith, 1-07-58 (6-30-2008)
2008 Ohio 3234 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
949 N.E.2d 43, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-td-ohio-2011.