In re T.D.

949 N.E.2d 43, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1556
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 22, 2011·No. 2011-0515·Published

Opinion

Clinton App. No. CA2010-01-002, 2011-Ohio-671. Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decisions in 2008-1624, In re Smith, Allen App. No. 1-07-58, 2008-Ohio-3234, and 2009-0088, State v. Williams, Warren App. No. CA2008-02-029, 2008-Ohio-6195; and briefing schedule stayed.

Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., would accept Proposition of Law No. II without holding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re T.D., 949 N.E.2d 43, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1556 (Ohio 2011).

949 N.E.2d 43 (In re T.D.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Williams, Ca2008-02-029 (12-1-2008)
2008 Ohio 6195 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)
In Re Smith, 1-07-58 (6-30-2008)
2008 Ohio 3234 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)