In re T.B.
This text of 859 N.E.2d 977 (In re T.B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Franklin App. No. 06AP-769, 2006-Ohio-4789, and 2006-0hio-5300. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. It appears from the records of the court that the appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due October 27, 2006, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,
It is ordered by the court that this cause is dismissed sua sponte.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
859 N.E.2d 977, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tb-ohio-2007.