In re Taysean S.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Taysean S.

83 A.D.3d 595, 920 N.Y.S.2d 909

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 26, 2011

StatusPublished

This text of 83 A.D.3d 595 (In re Taysean S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Taysean S., 83 A.D.3d 595, 920 N.Y.S.2d 909 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Allen G. Alpert, J.), entered on or about May 3, 2010, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts that, if by committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of attempted robbery in the second degree, attempted grand larceny in the fourth degree, assault in the third degree and menacing [596]*596in the third degree, and placed him with the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations. The record fails to support appellant’s assertion that the victim exaggerated the extent of appellant’s unlawful conduct. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Friedman, Abdus-Salaam and Roman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Allen G. Alpert, J.), entered on or about May 3, 2010, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts that, if by committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of attempted robbery in the second degree, attempted grand larceny in the fourth degree, assault in the third degree and menacing [596]*596in the third degree, and placed him with the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations. The record fails to support appellant’s assertion that the victim exaggerated the extent of appellant’s unlawful conduct. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Friedman, Abdus-Salaam and Roman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

83 A.D.3d 595, 920 N.Y.S.2d 909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-taysean-s-nyappdiv-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack