In re Taylor

Fourth Circuit

In re Taylor

362 F. App'x 371

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 26, 2010·No. No. 09-2180·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Donald Lynn Taylor petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the proceedings in the district court reveals that there has been no undue delay. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Donald Lynn Taylor petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the proceedings in the district court reveals that there has been no undue delay. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

In re Taylor, 362 F. App'x 371 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

362 F. App'x 371 (In re Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related