In Re Tayler
This text of 962 A.2d 128 (In Re Tayler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re TAYLER F. et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jon D. Golas, Manchester, in support of the petition.
Sheila A. Huddleston, John H. Beers, Hartford, and Benjamin Zivyon, assistant attorney general, in opposition.
The petition by the respondent mother for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 111 Conn.App. 28, 958 A.2d 170 (2008), is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court properly admitted statements under the residual exception to the hearsay rule?"
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18280.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
962 A.2d 128, 290 Conn. 901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tayler-conn-2008.