In Re Tavares

23 B.R. 129, 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 3357
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island
DecidedSeptember 13, 1982
DocketBankruptcy 8000044
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 23 B.R. 129 (In Re Tavares) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Tavares, 23 B.R. 129, 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 3357 (R.I. 1982).

Opinion

ARTHUR N. VOTOLATO, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.

In dispute is whether a creditor’s proof of claim may be filed out of time.

The Debtors filed their Chapter 13 petition on January 18, 1980 and listed Myron Herman Co. as a creditor. On February 8, 1980 notices were mailed to all creditors stating that the first meeting of creditors was scheduled for February 19, 1980 and that all creditors’ claims were required to be filed within six months of that date. A proof of claim from Myron Herman Co. in the amount of $622.02 was received by the bankruptcy clerk’s office on December 29, 1980, more than four (4) months late, and the Trustee objects to its allowance.

11 U.S.C. § 501(a) provides that “a creditor ... may file a proof of claim.” Since that section does not establish time limitations for the filing of proofs of claim, Rule 302 of the Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure continues to apply. H.R. Rep. No. 95-595, 95th Cong., 1st Sess. 351 (1977), U.S. Code Cong. & Admin. News 1978, p. 5787; 3 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 501.02 (15th ed. 1981). Rule 302(e) provides:

(e) Time for Filing. A claim must be filed within 6 months after the first date set for the first meeting of creditors....

*130 The creditor in this ease filed its claim 10 months after the first date set for the first meeting of creditors, well outside the limitation set forth in Rule 302. No request for an extension was filed within the six month period. See Bankruptcy Rule 302(e)(1).

Since the six month filing requirement is a mandatory and nondiscretionary statute of limitations, Myron Herman Company’s late claim may not be allowed. See In re Brown, 14 B.R. 233 (Bkrtcy. N.D. Ill. 1981); In re Aisted Automotive Warehouse, Inc., 16 B.R. 924 (Bkrtcy. E.D.N.Y. 1982).

Enter order accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Grigelevich
81 B.R. 3 (D. Rhode Island, 1987)
In Re Sitzberger
65 B.R. 256 (S.D. California, 1986)
In re Myers
60 B.R. 108 (District of Columbia, 1986)
In Re Rea
57 B.R. 834 (District of Columbia, 1985)
Lazar v. Sullivan
36 B.R. 771 (E.D. New York, 1984)
In Re Thurston
52 B.R. 71 (D. Colorado, 1983)
In Re Seminole Backhoe Services, Inc.
33 B.R. 914 (N.D. Texas, 1983)
In Re Markey
33 B.R. 332 (N.D. Ohio, 1983)
In Re Hatchett
31 B.R. 833 (E.D. Virginia, 1983)
In Re Greene
30 B.R. 729 (D. Rhode Island, 1983)
In Re Corbett
27 B.R. 442 (W.D. Missouri, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 B.R. 129, 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 3357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tavares-rib-1982.