in Re Tatiana Telegina

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: May 2, 2019
• Docket: 09-19-00133-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-19-00133-CV __________________

IN RE TATIANA TELEGINA __________________________________________________________________

Original Proceeding County Court at Law No. 3 of Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 17-11-14052-CV __________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Tatiana Telegina complains that the trial court clearly abused its discretion by

granting temporary protective orders that effectively limited discovery to: the

validity of the parties’ marital settlement agreement and Telegina’s claims that the

real party in interest, Vladimir Nechayuk, violated the terms of the agreement; and

claims for partition of undivided marital assets. Additionally, Telegina complains

that the trial court abused its discretion by denying her motion for sanctions.

A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will issue only to correct

a clear abuse of discretion for which the relator has no adequate remedy by appeal.

1 See In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.

proceeding); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig.

proceeding). After considering the petitions, as supplemented, and examining the

exhibits contained in the appendices, we conclude that Telegina has not established

that she is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny the petition for a writ

of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

PETITION DENIED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on May 1, 2019 Opinion Delivered May 2, 2019

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.