Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Tartaglia

In re Tartaglia

82 A.D.3d 991, 923 N.Y.2d 329
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 2011
StatusPublished

This text of 82 A.D.3d 991 (In re Tartaglia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Tartaglia, 82 A.D.3d 991, 923 N.Y.2d 329 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

[992]*992Ordered that, effective immediately, the respondent, Daniel D. Tartaglia, admitted as Daniel David Tartaglia, is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law and the Clerk of the Court is directed to restore the name of Daniel David Tartaglia to the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law. Prudenti, EJ., Mastro, Rivera, Skelos and Balkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 A.D.3d 991, 923 N.Y.2d 329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tartaglia-nyappdiv-2011.