In re Tarigo

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Tarigo

121 A.3d 877, 223 N.J. 242, 2015 N.J. LEXIS 961

DecidedSeptember 28, 2015

StatusPublished

This text of 121 A.3d 877 (In re Tarigo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Tarigo, 121 A.3d 877, 223 N.J. 242, 2015 N.J. LEXIS 961 (N.J. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 14r-364, concluding that as a matter of reciprocal discipline pursuant to Rule 1:20 — 14(a) (4), THOMAS J. TARIGO of WALNUT, CALIFORNIA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2001, should be admonished based on discipline imposed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for conduct that in New Jersey violates RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect) and RPC 3.1 (filing frivolous pleadings);

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that THOMAS J. TARIGO is hereby admonished; and it is further

[243]*243ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI