In Re Tara Sturgeon v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 21, 2023
Docket01-23-00909-CV
StatusPublished

This text of In Re Tara Sturgeon v. the State of Texas (In Re Tara Sturgeon v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Tara Sturgeon v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Opinion issued December 21, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00909-CV ——————————— IN RE TARA STURGEON, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Tara Sturgeon, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of

mandamus asserting that the trial court had abused its discretion by: (1) “not

returning” relator’s minor children to her custody; (2) “by entering the January 24,

2023 Temporary Order Following Adversary Hearing”; (3) terminating relator’s

visitation to her minor children after a July 20, 2023 hearing; and (4) failing to provide relator with effective counsel.1 Relator requested that the Court “issue a

writ of mandamus directing the [trial] court to restore constitutional protections of

the family, [and to] return the children to their parents, immediately.”

Our review of relator’s mandamus petition reflects that relator has failed to

establish that she is entitled to mandamus relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A)

(relator required to provide appendix which “must contain” certified or sworn copy

of any “document showing the matter complained of”), 52.7(a) (relator “must file”

record with mandamus petition containing “certified or sworn copy of every

document that is material to the relator’s claim for relief and that was filed in any

underlying proceeding”), 52.8(a); see also Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837

(Tex. 1992). Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Countiss, and Farris.

1 The underlying case is In the Interest of L.S., O.S., and A.S., Children, Cause No. 2023-00153J, in the 314th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Michelle Moore presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walker v. Packer
827 S.W.2d 833 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re Tara Sturgeon v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tara-sturgeon-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.