In re Tara of North Hills

Fourth Circuit

In re Tara of North Hills

896 F.2d 547, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 1564, 1990 WL 12656

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 7, 1990

Docket89-1543_1

StatusUnpublished

This text of 896 F.2d 547 (In re Tara of North Hills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Tara of North Hills, 896 F.2d 547, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 1564, 1990 WL 12656 (4th Cir. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

896 F.2d 547
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
In re TARA OF NORTH HILLS, a North Carolina General
Partnership, Debtor.
PIONEER SAVINGS BANK, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellee,
and
David W. Boone, trustee in bankruptcy for Tara of North
Hills, Plaintiff,
v.
Barney K. HUANG; Lindy W. Huang, Defendants-Appellants,
and
Garland Avent; Ann R. Avent, Defendants.

No. 89-1543.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 27, 1989.
Decided: Feb. 7, 1990.

Trawick H. Stubbs, Jr., Jeffrey A. DeMatthew, Stubbs, Perdue, Chesnutt, Wheeler & Clemmons, P.A., for appellants.

John M. Shaw, David M. Warren, Laura Broughton Russell, Poyner & Spruill, P.A., for appellees.

Before SPROUSE and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The appeal in this bankruptcy case concerns allegations by Barney and Lindy Huang that Pioneer Savings Bank breached its duty to act in good faith and deal with them fairly in respect to a mortgage debt. The Huangs urge that the district court erred in affirming the bankruptcy court's entry of summary judgment for Pioneer.

Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Boone v. Huang (In re Tara of North Hills ), 89-509-Civ-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 28, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before us and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

896 F.2d 547
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
In re TARA OF NORTH HILLS, a North Carolina General
Partnership, Debtor.
PIONEER SAVINGS BANK, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellee,
and
David W. Boone, trustee in bankruptcy for Tara of North
Hills, Plaintiff,
v.
Barney K. HUANG; Lindy W. Huang, Defendants-Appellants,
and
Garland Avent; Ann R. Avent, Defendants.

No. 89-1543.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 27, 1989.
Decided: Feb. 7, 1990.

Trawick H. Stubbs, Jr., Jeffrey A. DeMatthew, Stubbs, Perdue, Chesnutt, Wheeler & Clemmons, P.A., for appellants.

John M. Shaw, David M. Warren, Laura Broughton Russell, Poyner & Spruill, P.A., for appellees.

Before SPROUSE and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The appeal in this bankruptcy case concerns allegations by Barney and Lindy Huang that Pioneer Savings Bank breached its duty to act in good faith and deal with them fairly in respect to a mortgage debt. The Huangs urge that the district court erred in affirming the bankruptcy court's entry of summary judgment for Pioneer.

Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Boone v. Huang (In re Tara of North Hills ), 89-509-Civ-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 28, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before us and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

896 F.2d 547, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 1564, 1990 WL 12656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tara-of-north-hills-ca4-1990.