In Re: Tara McDaniel v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re: Tara McDaniel v. the State of Texas (In Re: Tara McDaniel v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DENY and Opinion Filed March 21, 2023
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-01370-CV
IN RE TARA MCDANIEL, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 160th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-07909
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Reichek, Carlyle, and Kennedy Opinion by Justice Reichek In her December 28, 2022 petition for writ of mandamus, relator complains
that the trial court abused its discretion by (1) denying her plea in abatement and
(2) disqualifying her attorney Aaron Cartwright. We strike the petition in part and
deny the remainder of the petition.
At the threshold, we strike the portion of the petition seeking mandamus relief
from the denial of relator’s plea in abatement. Because we questioned whether
Cartwright may represent relator in this original proceeding in light of the trial
court’s disqualification order, we requested letter briefing regarding this issue. After
reviewing the parties’ submissions, we conclude that Cartwright is prohibited from
representing relator in this mandamus proceeding with respect to the abatement issue because it is part of the underlying matter and the trial court’s disqualification order,
which has not been stayed, remains in effect.
In any event, relator has failed to show her entitlement to mandamus relief for
both issues. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial
court clearly abused its discretion and that she lacks an adequate remedy by appeal.
See In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.
proceeding). After reviewing the petition and the record before us, we conclude that
relator has not made this showing for both issues.
Accordingly, we strike the petition in part and deny the remainder of the
petition. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
/Amanda L. Reichek/ AMANDA L. REICHEK JUSTICE
221370F.P05
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Tara McDaniel v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tara-mcdaniel-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.