in Re Tara & Kevin Bove
This text of in Re Tara & Kevin Bove (in Re Tara & Kevin Bove) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-21-00138-CV
IN RE Tara BOVE and Kevin Bove, Relators
Original Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Beth Watkins, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
Delivered and Filed: April 28, 2021
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
Relators have filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary relief. We
may issue writs of mandamus when “agreeable to the principles of law regulating those writs.”
TEX. GOV’T CODE § 22.221(b). For mandamus, a relator has the burden to file a petition and record
showing “the trial court abused its discretion and that no adequate appellate remedy exists.” In re
H.E.B. Grocery Co., L.P., 492 S.W.3d 300, 302 (Tex. 2016) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam).
Having reviewed the petition and documents included in the appendix, we conclude relators have
not satisfied their burden. Accordingly, we deny the petition and motion for temporary relief. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2020-CI-22591, styled In the Interest of A.L.F., a Child, pending in the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable David A. Canales presiding (denying the motion to strike) and the Honorable Rosie Alvarado (denying the motion to reconsider).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Tara & Kevin Bove, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tara-kevin-bove-texapp-2021.