In re Tanya Y.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Tanya Y.

16 A.D.3d 229, 790 N.Y.S.2d 605, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2683

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 17, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 16 A.D.3d 229 (In re Tanya Y.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Tanya Y., 16 A.D.3d 229, 790 N.Y.S.2d 605, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2683 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Alma Cordova, J.), entered on or about February 11, 2004, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that she committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of assault in the third degree and menacing in the third degree, and placed her with the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v [230]*230Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 [1987]). There is no basis upon which to disturb the court’s determinations concerning identification and credibility. The credible evidence established that appellant acted in concert with two other girls in assaulting the victim. Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Ellerin and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Alma Cordova, J.), entered on or about February 11, 2004, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that she committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of assault in the third degree and menacing in the third degree, and placed her with the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v [230]*230Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 [1987]). There is no basis upon which to disturb the court’s determinations concerning identification and credibility. The credible evidence established that appellant acted in concert with two other girls in assaulting the victim. Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Ellerin and Nardelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.3d 229, 790 N.Y.S.2d 605, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tanya-y-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack