In re Tantillo
This text of 157 A.D.2d 784 (In re Tantillo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the petitioner from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Suffolk County (Signorelli, S.), dated September 28, 1988.
Ordered that the decree is affirmed, without costs or disbursements (see, Matter of Imperato, 44 Mise 2d 639, revd 24 AD2d 598, revd 18 NY2d 825, for reasons stated by Surrogate Hildreth; Matter of Rutherford, 125 AD2d 312; Matter of Kronen, 114 AD2d 1033, affd 67 NY2d 587). Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
157 A.D.2d 784, 551 N.Y.S.2d 797, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tantillo-nyappdiv-1990.