in Re Tanisa Jeffers
This text of in Re Tanisa Jeffers (in Re Tanisa Jeffers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-16-00679-CR
In re Tanisa Jeffers
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM HAYS COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Based on the record in this case as viewed through our standard of review, we
deny Jeffers’s petition.1
__________________________________________
Bob Pemberton, Justice
Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Goodwin
Filed: February 6, 2017
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a); see also Ex parte Blanchard, 736 S.W.2d 642, 643 (Tex. 1987) (“Due process requires that the alleged contemnor be personally served with a show cause order or that it be established that he had knowledge of the content of such order.” (emphasis added) (citing Ex parte Herring, 438 S.W.2d 801, 803 (Tex. 1969))).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Tanisa Jeffers, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tanisa-jeffers-texapp-2017.