in Re Tanisa Jeffers

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 6, 2017·No. 03-16-00679-CR·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-16-00679-CR

In re Tanisa Jeffers

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM HAYS COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Based on the record in this case as viewed through our standard of review, we

deny Jeffers’s petition.1

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Goodwin

Filed: February 6, 2017

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a); see also Ex parte Blanchard, 736 S.W.2d 642, 643 (Tex.

1987) (“Due process requires that the alleged contemnor be personally served with a show cause order or that it be established that he had knowledge of the content of such order.” (emphasis added) (citing Ex parte Herring, 438 S.W.2d 801, 803 (Tex. 1969))).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Tanisa Jeffers, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

in Re Tanisa Jeffers (in Re Tanisa Jeffers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Blanchard
736 S.W.2d 642 (Texas Supreme Court, 1987)
Ex Parte Herring
438 S.W.2d 801 (Texas Supreme Court, 1969)