in Re Tamsin Jacky and Kevin Squyres

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in in Re Tamsin Jacky and Kevin Squyres. Read the opinion of the Court — 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 8565 →

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 19, 2016·No. 01-16-00236-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-16-00236-CV Style: In re Tamsin Jacky and Kevin Squyres, Relators Date motion filed*: April 14, 2016 Type of motion: Unopposed First Motion to Extend Time to File Response to Petition for Writ of Mandamus Party filing motions: Real Party in Interest Deidre Squyres Baker Document to be filed: Response

Is appeal accelerated? Yes (original proceeding).

If motion to extend time: Original due date: April 22, 2016 Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Due Date: April 22, 2016 Date Requested: May 12, 2016

Ordered that motion is:  Granted If document is to be filed, document due: May 12, 2016.  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes 

Date: April 19, 2016

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Is appeal accelerated? Yes (original proceeding).

If motion to extend time: Original due date: April 22, 2016 Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Due Date: April 22, 2016 Date Requested: May 12, 2016

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes 

Date: April 19, 2016

November 7, 2008 Revision

in Re Tamsin Jacky and Kevin Squyres, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

in Re Tamsin Jacky and Kevin Squyres (in Re Tamsin Jacky and Kevin Squyres) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.