in Re Tami C. Pierce and Cynthia Siegel

Court of Appeals of Texas

in Re Tami C. Pierce and Cynthia Siegel

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 27, 2022·No. 01-22-00005-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Tami C. Pierce and Cynthia Siegel

Appellate case number: 01-22-00005-CV

Trial court case number:

Trial court: 180th District Court of Harris County

Real Party in Interest, the Honorable DaSean Jones, filed an Unopposed Emergency Request for Extension of Time in which to file his brief in response to the petition for writ of mandamus filed by Relators Tami C. Pierce and Cynthia Siegel. Real party’s motion is granted. Real party’s response brief is due February 7, 2022. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Veronica Rivas-Molloy Acting individually

Date: January 27, 2022

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Tami C. Pierce and Cynthia Siegel

Appellate case number: 01-22-00005-CV

Trial court case number:

Trial court: 180th District Court of Harris County

Real Party in Interest, the Honorable DaSean Jones, filed an Unopposed Emergency Request for Extension of Time in which to file his brief in response to the petition for writ of mandamus filed by Relators Tami C. Pierce and Cynthia Siegel. Real party’s motion is granted. Real party’s response brief is due February 7, 2022. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Veronica Rivas-Molloy Acting individually

Date: January 27, 2022

in Re Tami C. Pierce and Cynthia Siegel, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Pincite

in Re Tami C. Pierce and Cynthia Siegel (in Re Tami C. Pierce and Cynthia Siegel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.