In re Talisha L.

9 A.D.3d 432, 779 N.Y.S.2d 787, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9874

This text of 9 A.D.3d 432 (In re Talisha L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Talisha L., 9 A.D.3d 432, 779 N.Y.S.2d 787, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

In related custody and guardianship proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, Erica L. appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Lim, J.), dated September 6, 2002, which found that she lacked standing to petition for custody and guardianship of the subject children.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Under the facts of this case, the Family Court properly determined that Erica L. lacked standing to file the instant petitions (see Social Services Law § 383-c; Matter of Ricky Ralph M., 56 NY2d 77, 80 [1982]; Matter of Santosky v Roach, 161 AD2d 908, 908-909 [1990]; Matter of T.C. v R.C., 195 Misc 2d 417 [2003]). Santucci, J.P., Schmidt, Townes and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Ricky Ralph M.
436 N.E.2d 491 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
Santosky v. Roach
161 A.D.2d 908 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
T.C. v. R.C.
195 Misc. 2d 417 (New York Family Court, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 A.D.3d 432, 779 N.Y.S.2d 787, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-talisha-l-nyappdiv-2004.